Purpose: To assess the conformational changes of the common femoral artery (CFA) during hip joint flexion in patients without atherosclerosis.

Methods: Patients who underwent digital subtraction angiography for suspicion of arterial endofibrosis between 2007 and 2011 were retrospectively searched. Angiographic images were analyzed by two independent readers. The CFA was divided into four segments of equal length, and the segment containing the folding point was noted. Segments 1 and 2 were located in the proximal half of the CFA and segments 3 and 4 in the distal half. Readers assessed the CFA angulation, located the arterial folding point, and classified the CFA curvature as harmonious, or as a moderate or severe plication.

Results: Forty patients were included. The Lin concordance correlation coefficients, used to evaluate inter-observer variability, were 0.90 (95% CI [0.83; 0.96]), 0.96 (95% CI [0.93; 0.98]) and 0.96 (95% CI [0.94; 0.98]) for the measures of the CFA angle during flexion, of the length between the superficial circumflex iliac artery and the folding point, and of the length between the folding point and the femoral bifurcation, respectively. The CFA curvature was described as harmonious in 12 patients, moderate plication in 14 patients, and severe plication in 14 patients. The CFA folding point was located on segment 1, 2 and 3 in 6, 26 and 8 patients, respectively; no folding point was located on segment 4.

Conclusion: In these patients with non-atheromatous disease, hip flexion yielded most frequently a harmonious curvature or a moderate plication of the CFA.

The ankle-brachial index is an accurate tool for detecting claudication in atherosclerotic patients. However, this technique fails to identify subtle flow limitations of the iliac arteries (FLIA) in endurance athletes. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a noninvasive technique that measures skeletal muscle tissue oxygenation status. The aim of the present study is to examine the absolute and relative test–retest reliability of NIRS and evaluate its potential as a diagnostic tool in FLIA. NIRS-derived exercise variables were analyzed during exercise and recovery in FLIA 17 patients and 19 healthy controls. The relative reliability of absolute variables (such as the maximal value) were slight to yet predominantly substantial (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], ICC range: 0.06–0.76) with good to excellent absolute reliability (absolute limits of agreement [ALoA], ALoA range: 0.8 ± 10.2 to 0.7 ± 13.1; coefficient of variation [CV], CV range: 5%–11%). Absolute values encompassing signal amplitudes showed moderate to almost perfect relative reliability (ICC range: 0.51–0.89) and poor to good absolute reliability (ALoA range: −1.3 ± 7.0 to −2.5 ± 15.7; CV range: 15%–32%). Kinetic variables showed moderate to almost perfect relative reliability for most recovery kinetics variables (ICC range: 0.54–0.86) with fair to good absolute reliability (ALoA range: 0.4 ± 12.2 to 3.9 ± 37.9; CV range: 18%–27%). Particularly, kinetic variables showed significant differences between patients and healthy subjects. NIRS is found to be a reliable method for examining muscle tissue oxygenation variables. Given the significant differences in especially recovery kinetics between normal subjects and patients, NIRS may contribute to diagnosing FLIA in endurance athletes.

Iliac endofibrosis (IE) may cause lower limb ischaemia in younger endurance athletes (cyclists, triathletes, and long distance runners) as a result of subintimal fibrosis of predominantly the external iliac artery. Typical symptoms are reversible fatigue and ischaemic pain of the thigh (and calf) during strenuous exercise.

Subtle radiographic findings can increase the challenge of diagnosing external iliac artery endofibrosis. We evaluated a new metric, the bicycle exercise ankle brachial index recovery time (BART), in a cohort of cyclists with symptomatic external iliac artery endofibrosis. BART was defined as the time required in minutes for the ankle brachial index to return to 0.9 after a period of exercise. Surgical correction resulted in an improvement in BART postoperatively (4.5 ± 4.1 vs 9.1 ± 4.3 minutes; P < .001), with improved values correlating with better patient satisfaction. Documentation of the BARTs before and after surgical treatment provides an additional measure of postoperative hemodynamic improvement.