Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine a noninvasive method of evaluating external iliac endofibrosis in cyclists.

Methods: Eighteen highly trained male cyclists were divided into two groups: a pathology group (PG; 3 professional and 4 elite) and a control group (CG; 6 professional and 5 elite). Mean age was 26 +/- 6.1 yr for the PG and 24 +/- 4.09 for the CG. We studied humeral and tibial posterior pressure by using Doppler ultrasound and the ankle to arm index (AAI) before and after an incremental exercise test, performed on bike-ergometer until exhaustion. A Wilcoxon test was used to compare pressures and AAI in the PG. A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the PG with the CG. Fisher discriminant analysis was done to obtain a classification of the legs in ill or normal legs.

Results: The minimal AAI achieved in the PG was 0.76 +/- 0.13 for the normal leg (NL) and 0.35 +/- 0.04 for the ill leg (IL). We found significant differences (P < 0.01) from the 1st to 4th minute after exercise between the NL and the IL in the PG, and from the 1st to 10th minute after exercise between the IL and CG. We found significant differences in leg pressures between NL and IL in PG from the 1st to 4th minute (P < 0.01), and from the 1st to the 10th minute after exercise between CG and IL in the PG. Through discriminant analysis, we obtained a classification of the legs as ill or normal by applying a mathematical function at each recovery time studied.

Conclusions: AAI and leg pressures response to maximal exercise is a valid and noninvasive method for the evaluation of external iliac endofibrosis.

Purpose: This study compared ankle to brachial pressure indices (ABPI) before and after maximal exercise in three groups in order to investigate maximal exercise testing and ABPI as a useful procedure for the differential diagnosis of exercise-induced leg pain (EILP) in athletes.

Methods: ABPI measurements were taken before and after cycle ergometer exercise to volitional exhaustion or reproduction of symptoms in three groups: 1) untrained individuals (N = 10, 3 female, 7 male; age 35 +/- 5 yr (mean +/- SD)); 2) trained cyclists (N = 10, 3 female, 7 male; age, 30 +/- 5 yr); and 3) symptomatic group of trained cyclists, complaining of EILP (N = 12, 2 female, 10 male; age, 35 +/- 9 yr).

Results: Resting blood pressure indices were similar in all groups. ABPI were reduced (P < 0.05) in all groups after exercise. No differences between left and right legs were noted in the elite and untrained groups; however, a significant difference (P < 0.05) was noted between the nonsymptomatic (0.79 +/- 0.10) and symptomatic (0.61 +/- 0.20) legs in the subjects with EILP. Despite these group results, only three subjects in the symptomatic group met the published criteria (index of < 0.5) for endofibrosis of the external iliac artery. All positive ABPI tests were subsequently confirmed via arteriogram.

Conclusion: Maximal exercise testing combined with ABPI measurement is a simple noninvasive procedure that may be useful for the examination of EILP. The results of this study suggest that, in cases with unilateral symptoms, a between-leg ABPI difference of 0.18 (at the first minute of recovery) may be considered as a useful additional diagnostic criterion.

Purpose: This study defined how ankle arterial blood pressure measurements should be analyzed for the detection of moderate arterial disease (asymptomatic while walking). We used external iliac artery endofibrosis as a unique model of an isolated moderate arterial lesion, the role of which in exercise-related pain can be surgically proven. 

Methods: Patients who were ambulatory in our institutional referral center were studied. Brachial pressures, ankle pressures, and heart rate were measured simultaneously on all four limbs at rest and after maximal exercise in 108 healthy athletes and 78 patients (among 89 athletes referred for suspicion of endofibrosis) with confirmed or excluded external iliac endofibrosis. For these 78 patients, we calculated systolic ankle pressure change, ankle/brachial index, and deviation from the ankle/brachial index to heart rate regression line (DAHR) that was defined in the 108 healthy athletes. 

Results: In patients with endofibrosis, ankle/brachial index and ankle pressure were normal at rest. One minute after exercise, areas (mean ± SE of area) under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the diagnosis of endofibrosis were 0.91 ± 0.02, 0.91 ± 0.03, 0.95 ± 0.02, and 0.96 ± 0.02 for ankle pressure, pressure change, ankle/brachial index, and DAHR, respectively. For all criteria, area decreased with time in the recovery period. 

Conclusion: After heavy-load exercise, the ankle/brachial index at minute 1 should be used rather than the systolic ankle pressure value or ankle pressure change as a means of improving the efficacy of the detection of endofibrosis in athletes. A 0.66 value of the index at minute 1 after maximal exercise seems an optimal cutoff point for clinical use, providing a 90% sensitivity rate and 87% specificity rate in the diagnosis of moderate arterial lesions. At rest and after 1 minute of recovery, the ankle/brachial index to heart rate relationship should be considered to be an efficient tool for analyzing the results of pressures measurements and improving detection efficiency.